People
Own the outcome
- Set intent
- Review & override
- Decide
Sumnetics
We work with you on one live workstream to set clear roles for people and AI, agree when a person steps in, and keep your team accountable for the result.
What we do
For teams already paying for copilots and agents who want clearer ways of working, not more tools. You keep your stack; we strengthen how people and AI share the work.
For AI assistants and agents and, where relevant, robots working alongside people. See the research behind our approach.
How it works
You tell us about one workstream where people and AI already share the work.
We map who leads, what AI contributes, where a person steps in or overrides, and where cost and rework build up.
You receive a written integration playbook for that workstream, plus metrics to track.
What we need from you and the terms are under Terms.
Prices
Start small with the Score Report. Every later step is optional: you may decline at any point, and scope and deliverables are agreed in writing before any paid work starts.
Online checkout is not live yet.
Score Report details →Optional; you may decline. Scope and deliverables agreed in writing before work starts. Founding-client terms: [to confirm].
Optional; you may decline. Scope agreed in writing before work starts.
Optional; you may decline. Minimum term and notice: [to confirm].
All prices excl. Dutch VAT. B2B only.
Short free tastes only — a band and a line or two. The full collaboration score, role and override gaps, and 30-day plan sit in the paid Score Report. Nothing is sent to us unless you choose to send a note.
Answers stay in your browser.
2-minute team check2 min
How openly does your team talk about mistakes and ask for help? Five statements, about 2 minutes. You get a short taste (band + a line or two); the full reading is the Score Report.
Deeper taste: are we ready?8 min
15 questions on people and AI, about 8 minutes. Afterward you see a short taste only (band + a line or two). The full score and plan are in the Score Report. Answers from the short check carry over.
What does friction cost us?3 min
Calculator: estimate the cost of silos and turnover — and what you could reclaim. About 3 minutes.
Leadership style quiz4 min
About 4 minutes. Your leadership style shapes who reviews, overrides, and owns outcomes in a workstream — the Audit turns that into roles and review points.
Learn more
Own the outcome
Propose and iterate
Shared foundation
Work loops across levels until a person owns the outcome — not a straight handoff.
01
Human intuition
Empathy, ethics, creative problem-solving, and calm judgment when the path is unclear.
02
AI scale
Fast pattern recognition and quick summaries of large amounts of information.
= Work where each side does what it does best
Research that reviewed 106 experiments found that people and AI working together did, on average, worse than the better of the two working alone — with losses in decision tasks and gains in content-creation tasks. That is why we start with roles and review points, not with more tools.
What research says about people working with AI and robots, and about what makes teams work. Each link goes to the original publisher.
Nature Human Behaviour (Vaccaro, Almaatouq & Malone, MIT) — open access · 2024 · PDF
Across 106 experiments, human–AI combinations on average did worse than the best of humans or AI alone — with losses in decision tasks and gains in content-creation tasks.
NBER Working Paper 31161 (Brynjolfsson, Li & Raymond) · 2023 · PDF
An AI assistant raised customer-support productivity by 14% on average and 34% for novice and low-skilled agents, with minimal impact on the most experienced.
OECD · 2023 · PDF
Workers and employers in finance and manufacturing are generally very positive about AI’s impact on performance and working conditions; training and worker consultation go with better outcomes.
Stanford HAI · 2025 · PDF
A growing body of research confirms that AI boosts productivity and, in most cases, helps narrow skill gaps across the workforce.
NIST · 2023 · PDF
Human roles in decision-making and oversight of AI need to be clearly defined; human–AI configurations range from fully autonomous to fully manual.
ILO Working Paper 96 (Gmyrek, Berg & Bescond) · 2023 · PDF
Only clerical work is highly exposed; for most occupations generative AI is more likely to augment work — automating some tasks while leaving time for other duties — than to automate whole jobs.
MIT Task Force on the Work of the Future · 2020 · PDF
Robotics and AI are reshaping industries, but their effects on work unfold gradually — time to build skills and steer change toward broad benefit.
EU-OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work) · 2022 · PDF
Robots, including cobots, can take over non-ergonomic and monotonous tasks, freeing people for more cognitive or creative work — with physical, psychosocial and organisational effects to manage.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest (Kozlowski & Ilgen) — free access · 2006
A review of 50+ years of team research: cognitive, motivational and behavioural team processes drive effectiveness, and levers such as composition, training and leadership can improve them.
Google re:Work (People Analytics) · 2015
Studying 180 Google teams, researchers found that how a team works together matters more than who is on it — led by psychological safety, then dependability, structure and clarity, meaning, and impact.
PNAS (Riedl, Kim, Gupta, Malone & Woolley) · 2021
Across 22 studies with 5,279 people in 1,356 groups, a group’s collective intelligence was most strongly predicted by its collaboration process — more than individual skill or group composition.
U.S. National Research Council (National Academies) · 2015 · PDF
Team science can deliver greater impact, innovation, productivity and reach than solo work — but diversity, deep integration, size and misaligned goals create challenges teams must manage.
All prices excl. Dutch VAT. B2B only.
Wilfried de Wever· founder
Wilfried helps teams make AI useful without losing clear ownership of outcomes. Sumnetics grew from seeing copilots and agents adopted faster than roles and review points were agreed.
The practice is part of Humanity Solutions (KvK 71110178), trading as Foresight-Transitions, in The Hague. Sumnetics is the methods face for this work. The free SumOfUs check on this site is a short team reading — not a separate company.
Humanity Solutions · KvK 71110178 · Hamerstraat 67D, 2512 CX The Hague
Request an intro conversation →The Audit is from €5,900 excl. VAT; the first three clients get a founding-client price of €4,400. It is optional and you may decline. Scope and deliverables are agreed in writing before any work starts. If you would like a smaller first step, start with the €240 Human–AI Workstream Score Report, which includes a written follow-up answered by email within 4 working days. All prices are excl. Dutch VAT and for businesses only.
[to confirm with Wilfried] weeks from the intro conversation to the finished playbook.
About [to confirm with Wilfried] hours per person across [to confirm with Wilfried] weeks.
A written playbook for one workstream and the metrics to track (override rate, rework, trust and escalation).
We need a look at the tools and steps as they run today on that workstream. We do not take a copy of your production data unless you expressly agree it for the engagement.
The site and materials are in English for now. Conversations in Dutch: [to confirm with Wilfried].
No. You keep your stack. The work is about how people and AI share it: who leads, what AI may draft, and when a person steps in.
Where a workflow includes robots working alongside people, the same collaboration method applies — roles, review points and override rules.
They are calculated in your browser. Full-assessment results and cost figures are saved only in this browser (local storage) so your results can be shown again. You can delete them anytime with “Delete my answers”. Nothing is sent to us unless you choose to send a note.
Sumnetics is run by Wilfried de Wever. The practice is part of Humanity Solutions (KvK 71110178), trading as Foresight-Transitions, in The Hague.
Tell us about one workstream where your team uses AI. We reply by email to set up a short intro conversation.
Prefer email? Write to connectwithus@humanitysolutions.net (opens your email app).